I've been greatly disappointed.
Instead of finding a welcoming venue with encouragement for budding constesters like myself (albeit still very much a little pistol), I've found a mostly closed society that seems intent on bickering amongst themselves over issues that apparently have swirled within the contesting realm for years. Quite frankly it's a shame because there seems to be several level-headed contributors, like K1TTT and K5ZD (and many others that I'm not bothering to mention). Unfortunately the words of these hams are offset by many others who seem hell-bent on taking the opposite side of any argument.
Not that the aforementioned hams are always right in their viewpoints, in many cases there's not a 'right or wrong'. But to read the constant back and forth has become taxing and certainly isn't enjoyable. And I believe in self-policing and self-regulation, as well as freedom of speech, but it's gotten ridiculous. The latest big argument is over making submitted logs public and whether operators can gain an unfair advantage by scrutinizing the logs of stations that are competitors. While I can understand that this may be crucial to some, I've come to the realization that I've got better things to do.
I've also concluded that I simply don't want to take contesting (or ham radio for that matter) as serious as some seem to. It IS a hobby, after all. It should be something that you enjoy and don't argue over relentlessly. I've also realized that I'm out of my league when it comes to all the issues surrounding contesting.
Still, more troublesome was the unwillingness to welcome new posters, offer encouragement, and the tendency to point out the lack of knowledge of someone just getting started in contesting. I don't see the purpose in tearing someone down in order to make yourself look smarter or more capable. I should add, I never posted there, but I witnessed this behavior several times over the last few months.
So with that, I'm pulling the plug on the CQ-Contest emailing list. I'll keep contesting, of course, but definitely with a different perspective now.
There's been a growing amount of chatter on many blogs concerning the 'Future of Ham Radio' and what we, collectively, can do to shape that and encourage more younger operators. Well, here's a suggestion. When you go to form the committee, don't invite those guys. You'll just end up arguing and they certainly won't roll out the welcome wagon.
3 comments:
I have had success with getting to know local contesters and volunteering to work a multi-op with them. For CQWW CW, I e-mailed all the hams I regularly talk with and asked if they knew anyone looking for an operator. I met some terrific operators and made some friends that way. Not only that, I have learned more about contesting and operating too. Find a large field day operation near you and seek out the contesters among the group. You'll know them when you see them operating. They'll be the ones working without a lot of chit-chat. Get an e-mail address or two and ask to hang out if they are involved with a multi-op sometime during contest season.
Don, AC7FA
Hi Don - thanks for your comment. I realize that there's bound to be some great guys who regularly contribute to the CQ-Contest reflector, guys who would be more than willing to help out a fellow ham who is interested in elevating their contesting skills. However, I was very dismayed at how the group as a whole treated new posters, or posters who asked questions that might have been considered too trivial or too insignificant to warrant a proper reply.
Regardless, your suggestion is a terrific one and I will follow it. I'm sure that most folks are more inclined to help out whenever the meeting is face-to-face, rather than an anonymous posting on a reflector.
73 and thanks for the comment!
Ed
I'm also a new contester and newer ham too. I'm not new to the Internet though and have spent way too much time on forums and mailing lists. What you describe here is often typical of any other public forum I've interacted with that has folks that are passionate (sometimes obsessed) about whatever is being discussed. And there's always a few that seem their objective is, as you described, to take the opposite side of what is being discussed.
Of course none of that makes what goes on right, but it just seems to be the way these forums all seem to be. I'm sure folks will say the same about places like eHam, etc or other ham related mailing lists.
At least with the CQ Contest list, you can pop-in whenever you want at http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/ and peruse what has been posted and skip over the topics which don't seem to be of interest or start out useful and end in the typical argumentative fashion.
I'm lucky to have a local, active club with a bunch of tremendous fellow contesters that are more then willing to help out with any questions and provide suggestions and strategy.
David - K2DSL
Post a Comment